Michal Wallace writes: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Luke Palmer wrote: > > > I have somewhat a predicament. I want to create a continuation, and > > have that continuation stored in the register stack that it closes > > over (this is how I'm implementing a loop with continuations). > > Unless I'm having a major braino, I don't think this is possible at > > the moment. > > > > I got around this by adding two ops: new_noinit and init. I've > > included a patch that implements them. Other solutions welcome. > > Hmm. That sounds like Coroutine.
Uh, how so? Are we mixing up Continuation/Coroutine vocabulary again? > Also, when you invoke any kind of sub with the calling conventions, > it's already in P0. Can't you store that in a local variable on the > invoke? Yeah, I wouldn't normally consider it pad material, but that does seem like the cleanest way at the moment. Luke
