I left something uncommented in my prior patch, causing failure. Fixed.
This is additional tests for :w using (), [], \b and :: for separation.
-Dino
--
.~. Dino Morelli
/V\ email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/( )\ weblog: http://categorically.net/d/blog/
^^-^^ preferred distro: Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
Index: t/p6rules/ws.t
===================================================================
--- t/p6rules/ws.t (revision 8109)
+++ t/p6rules/ws.t (working copy)
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
use strict;
use warnings;
-use Parrot::Test tests => 15;
+use Parrot::Test tests => 17;
use Parrot::Test::PGE;
@@ -23,6 +23,15 @@
p6rule_is ('foo-bar', ':w foo -? bar', 'basic ws match \s* \s*');
p6rule_isnt('foobar', ':w foo -? bar', 'basic ws non-match');
+# with :w not separated by a space
+# XXX: These forms of modifier separation do not yet work
+#p6rule_is ('foo - bar', ':w()foo -? bar', 'basic ws match');
+#p6rule_is ('foo - bar', ':w[]foo -? bar', 'basic ws match');
+p6rule_is ('foo - bar', ':w\bfoo -? bar',
+ 'basic ws match with boundary modifier separation');
+p6rule_is ('foo - bar', ':w::foo -? bar',
+ 'basic ws match with backtrack no-op modifier separation');
+
# XXX: When available, add tests for full form :words modifier
-# dont forget to change the number of tests :-)
+# Don't forget to change the number of tests :-)
