On 8/5/05, Ingo Blechschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > ~Str; # "<class>"? "Str"?
"Str" > ~::Str; # "<class>"? "Str"? I don't know how :: works anymore. I'll avoid these. > ~Str.meta; # "<class>"? (fill in please)? "Class" > ~::Str.meta; # "<class>"? (fill in please)? > > +Str; +::Str; > +Str.meta; +::Str.meta; # all errors? Yep... unless Str somehow specifies that it can be numified, which it shouldn't. > "some string".ref =:= Str; # true? Yeah, if .ref is what we end up calling it. > Str.ref; # (fill in please) Class ? > Str.meta.ref; # (fill in please) ETOOMUCHMETA at Luke line 40. I don't know about this one. Luke
