On Wed Jul 08 16:57:34 2009, s1n wrote:
> Recent changes to replace trait_auxiliary:<is> with trait_mod:<is> started
> causing dispatch problems. Code declaring a trait_mod:<is> inside of a
> module or role would fail to dispatch. There was a lengthy discussion in IRC
> with jnth and TimToady:
>
> http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2009-07-08#i_1300790
>
> Scroll up to see a few examples as well.
>
> -Jason "s1n" Switzer
Quoting more recent IRC:
08:29 < phenny> jnthn: 30 Sep 23:10Z <[Coke]> tell jnthn I need some guidance
on RT67364 - it refers to a 2 year old irc log, says there are
examples, I don't see any. You are namedropped.
08:34 < jnthn> phenny: tell [Coke] It appears that the issue being discussed
was resolved a different way (required named parameters). And I
know that works (we use it in the setting, for one). Overall,
traits are much more robust in nom, so I think we can safely
close that one.
Resolving.
--
Will "Coke" Coleda
