[perl #72696] [BUG] Defining two different enumerations with the same enum value should result in ambiguity in Rakudo; doesn't

[Will Coleda via RT]

Current status: mostly the same, looks like the leading & is no longer 
required:

15:19 < [Coke]> rakudo: enum A <a b c>; enum B <a b c>; say &a.perl
15:19 <+p6eval> rakudo ce15be: OUTPUT«===SORRY!===␤Symbol '&a' not 
predeclared
                in <anonymous> (/tmp/JQVXYcGEKu:1)␤»
15:22 < [Coke]> rakudo: enum A <a b c>; enum B <a b c>; say c.perl
15:22 <+p6eval> rakudo ce15be: OUTPUT«B::c␤»

-- 
Will "Coke" Coleda