On Sat Apr 12 19:55:27 2014, Mouq wrote:
> On Thu Sep 26 11:17:22 2013, elizabeth wrote:
> > TimToady pointed out that my work on converting [] and {} accesses to
> > sub calls, rather than method calls, had one more casualty:
> >
> > *[0]([1, 2, 3])
> >
> > This is tested in t/spec/S02-types/whatever.t, line 252 and currently
> > fudged.
>
> Works now:
>
> $ perl6 -e'say *[0]([1, 2, 3])'
> 1
>
> [...]
> It seems most of this conversation is about the behaviour of *(). I
> think a different report should be filed for *.() or the title of this
> report be changed. As an aside, what curries into a WhateverCode
> should probably be written in the spec somewhere…
Since said test runs fine and is no longer fudged, I'm closing this ticket.
