At 12:04 AM 8/7/00 +0200, Bart Lateur wrote:
>On Sun, 06 Aug 2000 01:38:13 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> >>Even in perl5 an XS module can do _anything at all_.
> >
> >It can't access data the lexer's already tossed out. That's where the
> >current format format (so to speak) runs you into trouble.
>
>Only if you insist on the identical syntax as it has been until now. You
>can cock something together something with here-docs. Implementation can
>at least partly be based upon sprintf.
You can fake it now, sure. But it makes embedding expressions in the
format-replacement a pain, and complicates the code a bit.
Besides, what formats let you do is nice, and quite easy. Rather than force
people to jump through hoops so we can remove it, we should instead
generalize what it does so everyone can use it.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap H.Merijn Brand
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Perl6 Prject Plan / Roadmap Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Bart Lateur
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 200... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 200... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th Augus... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
- Re: Language RFC Summary 4th August 2000 Damian Conway
