On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
> We DO need a Parrot Programming FAQ. I propose the IMCC faq functions
> as just that. We can still have the current Parrot FAQ, which is
> great at answering generic questions for people who haven't swallowed
> the blue pill yet. (Or was it the red pill, I vaguely remember Dan in a black
> trenchcoat and glasses, and guns.....)
I think separating the IMCC and parrot programming FAQs, or making the
IMCC faq a section of a larger Parrot FAQ, would be better. The IMCC FAQ
really ought to be about syntax rather than semantics.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
