Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Or, more succinctly, we're not going to screw with perl without a *darned* > good reason. Well, in the big picture, we *are* screwing with perl, and we know that we have darned good reason to. But to apply this metric to every fine-grained aspect of perl5 is silly. Perl6 should be a well-designed, consistent, integrated opus. If it goes against the grain of perl6's design to have system-specific system calls built in, then they shouldn't be built in, regardless of how it was in perl5. -- John Porter We're building the house of the future together.
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core GregLondon
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric fun... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric... Tom Christiansen