At 10:52 AM 8/25/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >But to apply this metric to every fine-grained aspect of perl5 is silly.
> >Perl6 should be a well-designed, consistent, integrated opus.
> >If it goes against the grain of perl6's design to have system-specific
> >system calls built in, then they shouldn't be built in, regardless of
> >how it was in perl5.
>
>That's silly. *ALL* syscalls are system specific. This is starting
>to sound like Java, which has its own brand of revisionism.
If the behind-the-scenes shenanigans are invisible and performance is at
worst acceptable, does it really matter how things are implemented?
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Dan Sugalski
