On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:16:40AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote: > 2) Windows's malloc() isn't as robust as Unix's
In what way? Windows malloc() is getting upset with buggy allocations that a Unix malloc() will typically stomach? [ie perl6 bugs] or Windows malloc() is getting upset with legal but awkward allocations we're asking it for? [ie its bugs that we're going to have to work around] Nicholas Clark