Steve Fink: # On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:30:42AM -0800, Brent Dax wrote: # > The attached patch adds a new stack type that only handles INTVALs. # > These are much more efficient than generic stacks--on Win32 # they shave a # > few ten-thousandths of a second off each run of the # rx_popindex op, and # > take a full hundredth of a second off the benchmark. It also shows # > performance improvements on BSD. They also take up less # memory. All # > tests pass on both platforms; one warning is removed (as a # side effect # > of the modified interface for regex stacks) and no new ones are # > introduced. # # Why call them rxStacks if they're just stacks of INTVALs? Why not # intStack or something? I can see them being useful in other code too.
That makes sense, I suppose. I don't know where else it would be used, so I didn't think of it. --Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] Parrot Configure pumpking and regex hacker <obra> mmmm. hawt sysadmin chx0rs <lathos> This is sad. I know of *a* hawt sysamin chx0r. <obra> I know more than a few. <lathos> obra: There are two? Are you sure it's not the same one?
