>>>>> "Bart" == Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Bart> On Tue, 22 Aug 2000 00:03:48 -0600 (MDT), Nathan Torkington wrote: >> Normally what you'd say is: >> >> with (%record) { >> .... >> } >> >> (look at me, using Larry's new ... operator :-) Bart> No you didn't. You typed four dots. That was the decimal version. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: impli... Nathan Torkington
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: i... David L. Nicol
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was R... Michael Fowler
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was R... Nathan Torkington
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH i... David L. Nicol
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSL... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSL... Damian Conway
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: impli... Markus Peter
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: i... Bart Lateur
- Re: PROTOPROPOSAL FOR NEW BACKSLASH was Re: implied pa... Bart Lateur
- Randal L. Schwartz