Tom Christiansen wrote:
>
> $count = getpwnam("tchrist")/l;
> $count = getpwnam("tchrist", LIST);
> $count = getpwnam("tchrist")->as_list;
>
> All of those, frankly, suck. This is much better:
>
> $count = () = getpwnam("tchrist");
Hmmm. I agree a general purpose mechanism is good, but in this case we
already have "scalar" so why not "list"?
$count = list getpwnam("tchrist");
While I agree that /l is bad, I think going through the crap of "= () ="
is even worse. Does it work? Yes. But is it easily usable and fun, even
for non-experts? No.
-Nate
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
- $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC 110 ... Uri Guttman
- Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Joe McMahon
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
