Re: RFC: Reimplement Warnings and Tainting as Pragmas

[Nathan Wiger]

> >Warnings and Tainting should be reimplemented as pragmas.
> 
> What part of warnings(3) and perllexwarn(1) are you in disagreement with?

Not yet fully-versed on everything having todo with 5.6, appears I made
a bit of an oversight (i.e., as you mention 'use warnings' is already in
5.6)!  So while not necessarily a bad idea, I guess I'm a little late
here. :-)

Is there any interest to do this in the community with tainting? Adding
a 'use tainting' to Perl 6 (or 5.7, for that matter)?

-Nate