Me writes:
: Larry:
: > Currently, @ and [] are a promise that you don't intend to use string
: > indexing on this variable.  The optimizer can make good use of this
: > information.  For non-tied arrays of compact intrinsic types, this
: > is going to be a major performance win in Perl 6.
: 
: Assuming that optimization opportunities remained intact,

They won't, but go on.

: do you think conflating @ and % would be a perl6 design win?

Nope, I still think most ordinary people want different operators for
strings than for numbers.  Dictionaries and calculators have very
different interfaces in the real world, and it's false economy to
overgeneralize.  Witness the travails of people trying to use
cell phones to type messages.

Larry

Reply via email to