David L. Nicol wrote: > No, that does not work: Right; I misunderstood what was wanted. -- John Porter
- what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2haveit]]) Garrett Goebel
- Re: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2h... Stuart Rocks
- Re: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2h... Mark Koopman
- RE: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2h... Sterin, Ilya
- Re: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[ni... Stuart Rocks
- RE: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2h... Sterin, Ilya
- RE: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2h... Sterin, Ilya
- Re: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[ni... 'John Porter '
- RE: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was... 'John Porter '
- RE: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2h... Sterin, Ilya
- Re: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[ni... Stuart Rocks
- RE: what's with 'with'? (was: [aliasing - was:[nice2h... Sterin, Ilya
