On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 05:33:29PM -0800, Ashley Winters wrote: > On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:59:04 -0800, David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:13:56AM -0600, Rod Adams wrote: > > > > > > ($k, $v) <== pop %hash; > > > make sense to anyone except me? > > > > ... the only time it's useful is > > if you want to process all the elements in the hash--in which case, > > why not just use C< each >? > > That's true for the PerlHash implementation, but what about > OrderedHash? Or LookupQueue? Still seems like a useful trick.
Good point. I'm glad you pointed that out, because it felt like this should be useful...glad to see it was just my imagination that was at fault. :> --Dks -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
