On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 17:39 -0800, Larry Wall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:23:14PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> : I could make the argument that it should be possible to decorate an > : object with a role. If that means generating a new anonymous class just > : to have a vtable to munge, so be it. > > Er, how is that different from what we already said? I didn't think it was, but this explanation used simple words that didn't rely on me pretending to care about weird mathematics. -- c
