On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 11:41:23AM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: > >Regarding Time::Local fields, it's an object now, so the order of things > > Should that be Time::localtime? In P5 there are Time::localtime & > Time::gmtime, which are thin OO facades over the language builtins. Then > there's the module Time::Local, which is entirely different. Hmm, I agree. I used Time::Local because that's what the draft Synopsis put them in, but Time is a better fit.
> All of those provide useful functionality, and probably Time::Local should > be part of the language, _or_ localtime & gmtime should be in a library. Not my call, but I think we can add timelocal and timegm soon. They're mostly cleverly-caching facades to Time.new anyway, no? Drop by on #perl6 if you want to hack on the Prelude side of this. -- Gaal Yahas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://gaal.livejournal.com/
