Good (and floating) point.

Boom boom! ;-)


How about this:

$antler.bar;
$xyzzy.:bar;
$blah. .bar;
$foo.  .bar;

That is, introduce only the non-space-filled .: variant, and retain the
space-filled long dot.

But do we really need *three* distinct forms of method call, in addition to
the (easily alignable) indirect object syntax?

Is:

> $antler. .bar;
> $xyzzy.  .bar;
> $blah.   .bar;
> $foo.    .bar;

really so intolerable, for those who are gung-ho to line up the method names?

Damian

Reply via email to