On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:50:23PM -0800, Jon Lang wrote: > Darren Duncan wrote: > > Now, with some basic types, I know how to do it, examples: > > > > Bool # Bool::True > > Please forgive my ignorance; but are there any cases where > 'Bool::True' can be spelled more concisely as 'True'? Otherwise, this > approach seems awfully cluttered.
Nearly all enum-like things can be spelled without their namespace qualifier, as long as they're unambiguous. So yes, Bool::True can be spelled 'True' as long as there's not some other form of 'True' floating around. Pm
