On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:17, Thom Boyer <t...@boyers.org> wrote:
> I'm curious about the change from "blorst" to "blast." I quickly figured out
> that "blorst" was
> derived from "BLock OR STatement" (as S04 used to say: "In fact,
> most of these phasers will take either a block or a statement (known as
> a I<blorst> in the vernacular)).
>
> The best that I can figure for "blast" is "BLock And STatement." But using
> AND
> seems less correct to me. Furthermore, "blast" is less likely to google up
> the results I need.
>
> So, what exactly _is_ the derivation of "blast"?
>
perhaps 'BLock or A STatement' or 'BLock, Alternatively, STatement',
or you can simply think of it as misspelled but nicer on the ears than
the eyes.
~jerry
