>>>>> "DD" == Darren Duncan <dar...@darrenduncan.net> writes:
Some tiny thoughts: DD> ... I would consider "Numeric" more broad, such as to include DD> anything that might conceivably be called a number, probably DD> user-defined, that isn't representable by a "complex". Is Numeric intended to have a guarantee of commutability? Ie, is it a ring? Or, put another way, would a Quaternion be a Numeric? DD> Or maybe better yet for completion sake, make "Gaussian" a role and DD> something like "Gaus" the type or something. Wasn’t his name Gauß? If so, then Gauß or Gauss, yes? In general, though, I agree with the thesis. -JimC -- James Cloos <cl...@jhcloos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
