Hey Adam, If your module is clearly meant to work with PDL data, then it is probably best to place it under the PDL namespace. If it provides a generic interface which merely uses PDL underneath, then placing it under Math:: or Statistics:: would probably be better.
This is a statistics package, so if it is PDL-centric, I suggest aligning it with PDL::Stats as best you can. Perhaps you could name the module PDL::Stats::GrubbsTest? David On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Adam X <awo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I want to make a Perl module that tests for Outlier data points. > > It would include methods see here: > http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35h.htm > - Grubbs Test > - Generalized Extreme Studentized Deviate (ESD) Test > - Tietjen-Moore Test > > What would a good module name be for this? > > PDL::Outlier::GrubbsTest? > > Math::Outlier::GrubbsTest? > > > Any suggestions? I'd like to use PDL underneath. > > Thanks, > Adam > > _______________________________________________ > Perldl mailing list > Perldl@jach.hawaii.edu > http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl > -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." -- Brian Kernighan
_______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list Perldl@jach.hawaii.edu http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
