Jason Opperisano wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 08:58, Steven S. wrote:
> 
> the above seems to be the result of a blocked packet with "set
> block-policy return" or a "block return ..." rule ...SYN goes out but
> SYN-ACK coming back in gets a RST...

I have no such policies.  It is my understanding that the CARP IP is never
used as the source address unless a specific nat/rdr rule is configured or
it's a response to a request to the CARP IP.   My last few rules are:

# Out of this firewall
 pass  out quick on bge0 proto  { tcp, udp, icmp } from any  to any keep
state
 pass  out quick on em0 proto  { tcp, udp, icmp } from any  to any keep
state
 pass  out quick on em1 proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from any to any keep state
 pass  out quick on em2 proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from any to any keep state
 pass  out quick on em3 proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from any to any keep state

>> My only thought is to try rdr and nat instead of binat, but binat
>> seems cleaner to me.  Any thoughts?
> 
> my only thought would be to "telnet 10.0.1.50 25"...  NAT is for
> machines outside the firewall that don't know any better.  the
> firewall knows better.

Except the host 1.1.1.180 is an mx for the domain I'm trying to get mail to.
I suppose I could set up something in /etc/hosts or a split DNS config, but
that seems more complicated than it needs to be.

Thanks for your time!

-Steve S.


Reply via email to