On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:03:55 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: >Personally, I prefer not to reveal the usernames behind the client >connections I'm making, so I use nullidentd. It's very simplistic; it >just returns a constant string for all ident requests. (It doesn't >appear to be in ports; I simply grabbed the source code from >packages.debian.org/nullidentd and built it myself.) >
What's better about that than making the flags -Hole on the inetd settings for identd? I haven't been got at in any way using that. Any need for another approach? >From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over? Do NOT CC me - I am subscribed to the list. Replies to the sender address will fail except from the list-server.
