* ed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-03 19:38]: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:30:12 +0100 > Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > it is broken no matter what and deserves to be ignored at least, or > > better yet, actively faught. > It's not entirely broken though.
no. it is even worse. > DK is worth a look too, but it's added components to a mail > server. DomainKeys (as in, the original proposal) actually makes a lot of sense and does solve the problem it claims to solve without the gigantic colliteral damage that makes spf worse than useless.
