Dave Page a écrit : > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Field <[email protected]> > wrote: >> About editing, I just tried this in the win32 beta3, and it still >> ignores the changes you make: I went to create a new job step, >> selected batch, typed gibberish in the name and definition, unchecked >> 'read only', and erased the generated SQL and replaced it with "select >> 'hello'", and then clicked OK, and it added the gibberish step (rather >> than doing nothing, which is what select-hello should've done...) So >> 'read only' doesn't seem to be useful at this point. > > Oh, I see what you mean. If memory serves, the pgAgent dialogues > process their SQL in a slightly different way to all the other > dialogues because they need to run some parts in different steps. > > Guillaume; this is your code ( :-p ) - do you see a simple way to fix > it, or should the checkboxes be disabled on the three pgAgent > dialogues? >
Actually, it's not really useful in that context. We should simply disable the checkbox on these dialogs. Perhaps we don't even need an SQL tab? Regards. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
