> david.g.johns...@gmail.com wrote: > >> b...@yugabyte.com wrote: >> >> I found this email from Peter Eisentraut: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/762cc764-74f0-13fb-77ed-16f91c90f40d%402ndquadrant.com >> >> It caused the 42601 error, « syntax error at or near “execute” ». So it >> looks like Peter’s patch hasn’t yet been adopted. What is the likelihood >> that it will be adopted in a future version? > > Closer to zero than one I'd say, given how that thread ended and not > subsequent activity on the feature in the five years since.
Thanks. Shall I assume, too, that there’s no under-the-hood functionality for cursors, analogous to what happens with a PL/pgSQL program at run-time, that does the moral equivalent of on-demand prepare for a cursor’s defining subquery?
