Am Dienstag, 6. Mai 2008 schrieb Daniel Schuchardt:
> so it depends on ? if i need an explicit cast?

A type cast can be attempted in three different contexts (see also CREATE CAST 
reference page):

- implicitly
- storage assignment
- explicitly

The explicit case is if you call CAST() or ::.  This is always allowed if an 
appropriate cast routine is defined.

The implicit case is if an operator or function requires type A and the 
expression is of type B.  This cast is only performed if the cast routine is 
defined and allowed for the implicit context.  The change in 8.3 was 
to "downgrade" many casting functions from implicit to assignment or 
explicit.

The storage assignment case is if the value has type A and is about to be 
stored into a column of type B.  This is allowed if the cast routine is 
allowed for the assignment context.  This is, perhaps surprisingly, a 
separate level between implicit and explicit casts.  So in reference to your 
subject line, yes, INSERT and UPDATE do have different casting behavior than 
SELECT.  (This is not really accurate, because the WHERE clause of an UPDATE 
would follow the same rules as a WHERE clause in SELECT.  The assignment 
context only applies for values that are really going to be stored.)

This is all in line with the SQL standard.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to