Am Tuesday, 19. August 2008 schrieb Ivan Sergio Borgonovo:
> > Is there any reason they put it that way in the standard other than
> > the mantra "stricter is better"?
>
> After reflecting a bit I think it is a matter of "failing earlier".

Deferrable constraints are an optional feature of SQL, and the reason this 
default is chosen is that systems with and without the feature behave the 
same.

> But it doesn't make things more transparent.
> Since there is no simple standard way to see which constraints are
> deferrable and no simple way to alter them.

Query information_schema.table_constraints to find out about existing 
constraints and their parameters.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Reply via email to