On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Regina Obe <l...@pcorp.us> wrote: > > On 01/10/2016 08:07 AM, Bill Moran wrote: > > >> So, the purpose of a CoC is twofold: > >> > >> A) Define what "being excellent" means to this particular > >> community. > >> B) Provide a process for how to resolve things when "being > >> excellent" doesn't happen. > >> > >> Without #1, nobody will want to do #2, as it's basically a > >> job that can never be done correctly. > > > I agree with you completely. That is actually why I included the link to > > the graphic in the last post. My point was, I have no intention of > > having a CoC that is full of drivel. I would want a clear, concise, > > no-B.S. CoC. > > > JD > > This may come as a big shock to many of you, but as a contributor > I don't care if you are racist, sexist, transphobic or whatever as long as > you > > 1) Are helpful when I ask a question > 2) Stick to the topic > 3) Don't get into petty etiquettes like "Please stop top posting" > and if you really need to - A polite we prefer top posting would do > > 4) Are sensitive to people on other operating systems other than your > preferred. >
+1 > > > My other concern about CoCs is I fear someone is going to come and demand > we change Master/Slave to Leader/Follower, because Master is a male term > and Slave is insensitive to grand-children of slaves. > Some people don't understand all these issues with she/he, for example, we in Russia are not really concern about this. > > > Thanks, > Regina > > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general >
