Got it


Thank you

> On Jun 12, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
> 
> On 06/12/2017 02:07 PM, armand pirvu wrote:
>> Hi
>> I was doing a test upgrade from 9.5 to 9.6 and the following lines caught my 
>> eye
>> postgres 10967 10911  0 15:59 pts/0    00:00:00 
>> /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_upgrade -d /var/lib/pgsql/9.5/data -D 
>> /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data -b /usr/pgsql-9.5/bin -B /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin -k -v
>> postgres 11141     1  0 16:00 pts/0    00:00:00 /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/postgres 
>> -D /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data -p 50432 -b -c synchronous_commit=off -c 
>> fsync=off -c full_page_writes=off -c listen_addresses= -c 
>> unix_socket_permissions=0700 -c unix_so
>> postgres 11160 10967  0 16:00 pts/0    00:00:00 sh -c 
>> "/usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_restore" --host '/var/lib/pgsql' --port 50432 
>> --username 'postgres' --exit-on-error --verbose --dbname 'dbname=birstdb' 
>> "pg_upgrade_dump_25288.custom" >> "pg_upgrad
>> postgres 11161 11160  6 16:00 pts/0    00:00:00 
>> /usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_restore --host /var/lib/pgsql --port 50432 --username 
>> postgres --exit-on-error --verbose --dbname dbname=birstdb 
>> pg_upgrade_dump_25288.custom
>> sudo grep -i port /var/lib/pgsql/9.6/data/postgresql.conf
>> [sudo] password for armandp:
>> port = 5432                          # (change requires restart)
>>                                      # supported by the operating system:
>> Is it something that I missed or is it intentionally using a non default 
>> port to avoid unintended client connections ?
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/pgupgrade.html 
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/pgupgrade.html>
> 
> "Obviously, no one should be accessing the clusters during the upgrade. 
> pg_upgrade defaults to running servers on port 50432 to avoid unintended 
> client connections. You can use the same port number for both clusters when 
> doing an upgrade because the old and new clusters will not be running at the 
> same time. However, when checking an old running server, the old and new port 
> numbers must be different."
> 
>> Thanks
>> Armand
> 
> 
> -- 
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>

Reply via email to