On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Michael Paquier < > michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> What do you think about the patch attached? > > > > Looks OK. Should it mention specifically "On a hot standby" rather than > "On > > a standby"? Otherwise people might be left confused on how they are > > supposed to do this on a generic standby. It is the kind of thing which > is > > obvious once you know it, but confusing the first time you encounter it. > > Yes, right. Let's update as you suggest. > new version looks good. Thanks, Jeff
