On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *>I'm am wondering whether "REASSIGNED OWNED" **needs fixing as well* > > *Possibly, but as the op is on 9.3, it is not available to him.* > You should check the docs again... > *I would also argue that since* *"OWNER TO new_owner" is available in all > other ALTER object statements, it is an omission and should be* > *included for extenstions as well..* > As am I, but omission or not I don't recall that we've ever back-patched new SQL grammar. David J.
