"dcrespo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> They are exactly the same, that's why I want to evaluate it only once
> and, depending on it, put the corresponding value into two different
> fields that must be returned, instead of evaluating once for each
> field. Any insight?
There's no solution that wouldn't cost you more than double evaluation,
for such a simple expression.
The general solution is to use two levels of SELECT:
select ..., x, x, ...
from (select ..., big-expr as x, ... from ... offset 0) ss;
You need the "offset 0" (which is otherwise a no-op) to prevent the
planner from folding the two selects into a single level and ending up
with two copies of big-expr anyway. The runtime overhead associated
with the extra plan level is about going to eat up whatever you might
save in this example, though with a seriously expensive expression
(for instance, a function that does some fairly expensive SELECT itself)
you might find it worth doing.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org/
