On 6/5/14, 9:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Rod Taylor <[email protected]> writes:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm not entirely convinced that it's worth the extra planning cycles,
though. Given the small number of complaints to date, it might not
be worth doing this. Thoughts?
Would this avoid execution of expensive functions in views when their
output is discarded?
Yes, as long as they're not marked volatile and don't return sets.
That would certainly make it useful for us.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect [email protected]
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
