On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:03:33PM -0700, Tom Lane wrote: > =?UTF-8?q?Asbj=C3=B8rn=20Sloth=20T=C3=B8nnesen?= <[email protected]> writes: > > Please see the following patches for implementing support for and > > migrating to Tau in PostgreSQL. > > While I don't particularly object to adding a tau() function, the > rest of this seems like change for the sake of change. What's the > point? And it had better be a darn good point, because > cross-version code differences are a constant source of maintenance > pain for us. We don't need ones that have no concrete value.
It's Tau day (6.28) in some parts of the world already. Might that be the cause? Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [email protected] iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
