On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote:
> The WAL files that pg_receivexlog writes will not be re-read soon basically,
> so we can advise the OS to release any cached pages when WAL file is
> closed. I feel inclined to change pg_receivexlog that way. Thought?

How do we know that the user doesn't plan to read them soon?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to