On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Peter Geoghegan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Per your other email, here's the patch again; hopefully I've got the >> right stuff in the file this time. > > Your patch looks fine to me. I recommend committing patch 1 with these > additions. I can't think of any reason to rehash the 2012 discussion.
I've committed the patch I posted yesterday. I did not see a good reason to meld that together in a single commit with the first of the patches you posted; I'll leave you to revise that patch to conform with this approach. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
