At 2014-10-14 20:09:50 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > I think that's a good idea. > > We could have pg_audit.roles = 'audit1, audit2'
Yes, it's a neat idea, and we could certainly do that. But why is it any better than "ALTER ROLE audit_rw SET pgaudit.log = …" and granting that role to the users whose actions you want to audit? -- Abhijit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
