Thom Brown wrote: > On 24 October 2012 18:17, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Marco Nenciarini <[email protected]> writes: > > > Please find the attached refreshed patch (v2) which fixes the loose ends > > > you found. > > > > Attached is a v3 patch that updates the syntax per discussion, uses what > > seems to me to be a saner (more extensible) catalog representation, and > > contains assorted other code cleanup. I have not touched the > > documentation at all except for catalogs.sgml, so it still explains the > > old syntax. I have to stop working on this now, because I've already > > expended more time on it than I should, and it still has the serious > > problems mentioned in > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] > > and > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] > > > > I'm going to mark this Returned With Feedback for the current CF. > > > > Does anyone have any intention of resurrecting this at this stage?
Not in this room. Do you? -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
