Re: Petr Jelinek 2014-11-25 <[email protected]>
> >Patch committed.
> 
> Thanks!

I'm a bit late to the party, but wouldn't

recovery_target_action = ...

have been a better name for this? It'd be in line with the other
recovery_target_* parameters, and also a bit shorter than the imho
somewhat ugly "action_at_recovery_target".

Christoph
-- 
[email protected] | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to