On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > To make things better in the buildfarm, we'd have to back-patch this into > all active branches, but I don't see any big problem with doing so. > Any objections? Back-patching sounds like a good idea to me. At least this will allow hamster to build all the active branches. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
