Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure how changing behavior like this in a minor release was
>> considered acceptable.

> I'm guessing that the fact that it changes behavior in cases like this
> wasn't recognized, but I suppose Peter will have to be the one to
> comment on that.

It was considered to be a bug fix; more, given the few complaints about
the clearly-broken old behavior, we thought it was a fix that would affect
few people, and them positively.  Sorry you're not happy about it, but
these things are always judgment calls.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to