2015-03-10 16:50 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <[email protected]>: > Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Pavel Stehule <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I am marking this as Ready For Committer, the patch is trivial and works > >> as expected, there is nothing to be added to it IMHO. > >> > >> The "=>" operator was deprecated for several years so it should not be > too > >> controversial either. > > > Committed with a few documentation tweaks. > > Was there any consideration given to whether ruleutils should start > printing NamedArgExprs with "=>"? Or do we think that needs to wait? >
I didn't think about it? I don't see any reason why it have to use deprecated syntax. Regards Pavel > > regards, tom lane >
