On 28 March 2015 at 05:16, Andrew Gierth <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <[email protected]> writes: > > Tom> I think the concern over backwards compatibility here is probably > Tom> overblown; but if we're sufficiently worried about it, a possible > Tom> compromise is to invent a numeric_rounding_mode GUC, so that > Tom> people could get back the old behavior if they really care. > > I only see one issue with this, but it's a nasty one: do we really want > to make all numeric operations that might do rounding stable rather than > immutable? >
Yeah, making all numeric functions non-immutable seems like a really bad idea. Regards, Dean -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
