Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes:
> Can't you just use deferred triggers?
That seems like the real $64 question.
> I'm not clear exactly when such a trigger should run. If the trigger issues
> more SQL, which also has triggers... do we run the PreCommit trigger twice?
> Or just accept that we wanted it to run just prior to commit but it kinda
> didn't?
Yeah. By the time you get rid of the logical inconsistencies in the
concept of a trigger that runs "at commit", it seems like you end up with
something not so different from the existing deferred-trigger facility.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
