On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree that the correct handling of this particular case is to mark it > as not-a-bug. We have better things to do.
+1 -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
